Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Knowlton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1998No. 97-1284PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. In Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 187, 190, 658 N.E.2d 237, 240, we said that “[w]hen an attorney engages in a course of conduct resulting in a finding that the attorney has violated DR 1-102(A)(4), the attorney will be actually suspended from the practice of law for an appropriate period of time.” The question before us, then, is an appropriate period of suspension.

Respondent misappropriated client funds. In Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Hallows (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 75, 77, 676 N.E.2d 517, 518-519, we said that, absent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Miami County Bar Ass'n v. HallowsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. KeelerOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BandyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. EisenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Akron Bar Ass'n v. HofferOhio Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API