Legal Opinion

Columbia Brick Works v. FREEMAN ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action to recover the value of building materials furnished by the plaintiff to William D. Kay-ton, allegedly upon the promise of the defendant, Joseph J. Freeman, acting on behalf of himself and his wife Shirley Freeman, to pay for such materials.

The case was tried without a jury. A judgment was entered against both defendants. The trial court found that the defendants unqualifiedly agreed to pay for the materials delivered to Kayton. The sole question before us is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion. We are of the opinion that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maeder Steel Products Co. v. ZanelloOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Silver Falls Timber Co. v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Harrison v. BirrellOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Oregon Home Builders v. Montgomery Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Mackey v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Romney Produce Company v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Copenhagen, Inc. v. KRAMER ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Boothe v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API