Legal Opinion

Boothe v. Bennett

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This appeal involves the application of ORS 41.530, which provides in substance that no evidence, except in writing, is admissible to charge a person upon a representation as to the credit, skill, or character of a third person.

In March, 1964, the defendant Bennett asked the plaintiff to guarantee a bank loan to Bennett in the amount of $10,000. The previous November, Bennett had borrowed $5,800 from the defendant Noce, who was his accountant. On March 12, 1964, $2,011.67 of this debt remained unpaid. A few days before March 12, Bennett had represented to the plaintiff that he needed $10,000…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Umpqua Valley Bank v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Brown v. SiemensOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Wuerth v. StiversMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bennett v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Columbia Brick Works v. FREEMAN ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brock & Davis Co., Inc. v. Charleston Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API