Boothe v. Bennett
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
This appeal involves the application of ORS 41.530, which provides in substance that no evidence, except in writing, is admissible to charge a person upon a representation as to the credit, skill, or character of a third person.
In March, 1964, the defendant Bennett asked the plaintiff to guarantee a bank loan to Bennett in the amount of $10,000. The previous November, Bennett had borrowed $5,800 from the defendant Noce, who was his accountant. On March 12, 1964, $2,011.67 of this debt remained unpaid. A few days before March 12, Bennett had represented to the plaintiff that he needed $10,000…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Umpqua Valley Bank v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Brown v. SiemensOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Wuerth v. StiversMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Bennett v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Columbia Brick Works v. FREEMAN ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brock & Davis Co., Inc. v. Charleston Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1977