Legal Opinion

Copenhagen, Inc. v. KRAMER ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

(Pro Tempore)

This is an action at law brought by the plaintiff, as subcontractor, against the defendants, as owners, for the reasonable and agreed value of labor and supplies furnished for the plumbing and heating of the defendants’ home.

In 1955 the defendants contracted with a Mr. Miller to construct a home for them in Portland, Oregon. Shortly thereafter, in 1955, Mr. Miller subcontracted orally with the plaintiff to install the plumbing and radiant heat in a floor slab in the house for a total of $3,028.98, including $80 extra for rock excavating and $23.98 for a sink. Later a sump pump…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Drinker v. Ritter, Lowe & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Keys v. GriffithOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Saylor v. Enterprise Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Eilertsen v. WEBEROregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Inman v. OllsonOregon Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pakos v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Schenk v. LampOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. United States National Bank v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. United States National Bank v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonOregon Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API