Legal Opinion

Allen v. Industrial Commission of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 2, 1979No. 1 CA-IC 2054PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Judge.

Petitioner sustained a fractured collarbone on February 9, 1977, when a jack slipped from under a truck causing the bumper to knock him to the ground. ASARCO accepted the claim and petitioner was given treatment, which included the use of a clavicle splint. Before the case closed, petitioner had a nonindustrial accident on June 8, 1977, in which he suffered a compression fracture of the fifth lumbar vertebra. Contending that the second accident resulted from the first injury, petitioner filed an additional claim in the pending case and a new claim. The claims were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. McNeely v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Oertel v. John D. Streett & CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Carabetta v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Stanley v. MoanArizona Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Toto v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Department of Labor & Industries v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API