Legal Opinion

Tatman v. Provincial Homes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1963No. 7756PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Chief Justice.

This is a certiorari proceeding to review an award of the Industrial Commission denying compensation. Petitioner was 50 years old at the time of the accident. He had been a carpenter for 20 years. On the day of the accident he was working on a scaffold about 15 feet off the ground from which he fell, sustaining injuries. He made a claim for benefits and on examination the doctors were of the opinion that petitioner had no orthopedic disability, but recommended psychiatric consultation. Petitioner was examined by a board of psychiatrists who found his condition to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Revles v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Sproul v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. McAllister v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Compensation Fund v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. McNeely v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API