Tatman v. Provincial Homes
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BERNSTEIN, Chief Justice.
This is a certiorari proceeding to review an award of the Industrial Commission denying compensation. Petitioner was 50 years old at the time of the accident. He had been a carpenter for 20 years. On the day of the accident he was working on a scaffold about 15 feet off the ground from which he fell, sustaining injuries. He made a claim for benefits and on examination the doctors were of the opinion that petitioner had no orthopedic disability, but recommended psychiatric consultation. Petitioner was examined by a board of psychiatrists who found his condition to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Revles v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Sproul v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- McAllister v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Adkins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- State Compensation Fund v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- McNeely v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.