Legal Opinion

DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 8, 1984No. 1 CA-IC 2914PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYERSON, Presiding Judge.

I. FACTS

This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission award denying com-pensability for a stroke occurring at work. The sole issue presented is whether A.R.S. § 23-1043.01.A. violates the Arizona constitutional provision regarding workers’ compensation, Ariz. Const, art. 18, § 8, and the federal constitutional guarantee of equal protection. We find no constitutional violations and affirm the award.

Petitioner (claimant), who worked as a nurse for a rest home, had a history of high blood pressure, which was medically managed during the year before…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. McNeely v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Southwest Cooperative Wholesale v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Polanco v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Charles v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Mudd v. Neosho Memorial Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API