Legal Opinion

Sobol v. Sobol

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action for the annulment of a marriage upon the ground of fraud.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

It is established that the defendant in this action was treated for tuberculosis prior to the time of his marriage and knew that he was suffering from the disease. Subsequently he was married to the plaintiff, and she has testified that the defendant represented to her prior to the marriage that certain symptoms which he displayed were the manifestations of a cold. It furthermore appears that within a few days subsequent to the marriage the defendant’s condition was such as to require the attention of a physician, who then diagnosed his case as tuberculosis, and that thereafter the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Di Lorenzo v. . Di LorenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Svenson v. . SvensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Gumbiner v. GumbinerNew York Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kober v. KoberNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Stone v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. Davis v. DavisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
  4. Rubman v. RubmanNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Russo v. Swift & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API