Gumbiner v. Gumbiner
New York Supreme Court
Action to annul a marriage.
1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.
Over a year before this marriage, plaintiff heard from a friend that her suitor, Mr. Gumbiner, had some pulmonary trouble. In' September, 1904, she mentioned this to defendant. She testified that he replied: “ No. I had a cold; I have nothing the. matter with me, I am perfectly well.” She also added: “At the time he looked well *212to me. He told me there was no such thing as pulmonary trouble; that he was well and in a fit condition to marry.” His health continued apparently good. Whether there were further conversations with defendant on this subject, or any inquiries made of his family, does…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Di Lorenzo v. . Di LorenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Domschke v. DomschkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sobol v. SobolNew York Supreme Court · 1914
- Rubman v. RubmanNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Shonfeld v. ShonfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Cervone v. CervoneNew York Supreme Court · 1935
- Chavias v. ChaviasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.