Legal Opinion

Gumbiner v. Gumbiner

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action to annul a marriage.

1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.

Over a year before this marriage, plaintiff heard from a friend that her suitor, Mr. Gumbiner, had some pulmonary trouble. In' September, 1904, she mentioned this to defendant. She testified that he replied: “ No. I had a cold; I have nothing the. matter with me, I am perfectly well.” She also added: “At the time he looked well *212to me. He told me there was no such thing as pulmonary trouble; that he was well and in a fit condition to marry.” His health continued apparently good. Whether there were further conversations with defendant on this subject, or any inquiries made of his family, does…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Di Lorenzo v. . Di LorenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Domschke v. DomschkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sobol v. SobolNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Rubman v. RubmanNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Shonfeld v. ShonfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. Cervone v. CervoneNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Chavias v. ChaviasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API