Legal Opinion

Davis v. Davis

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 12, 1919PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On petition for annulment of marriage. On -exceptions to master’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, V. C.

I find the fact as follows: Petitioner and defendant were married May 2d, 1916; petitioner is now twenty-five years of age; the parties, lived togthor as husband and wife until November, 1916; from November, 1916, to about April or May, 1917, they resided together in Caldwell; there was, during the latter period, no sexual relations; in April or May, 1917, a child Avas born Avhicli lived only for four days; defendant immediately after the birth of the child Avent west for his health; there have been no sexual relations since November, 1916; defendant, at the time of 'the marriage…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sobol v. SobolNew York Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lyannes v. LyannesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Wells v. TalhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Costello v. PorzeltNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  4. Robertson v. RothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Houlahan v. HorzepaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API