State v. Young
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtForrest, J.
Jack Young appeals from his convictions of first degree statutory rape and indecent liberties. A personal restraint petition has been consolidated with this appeal and the issues will be discussed together. Young claims that the court erred by: admitting medical testimony as to the abused condition of the victim's genitals; denying the appellant's motion to suppress evidence; denying a request for a new trial and new counsel; and failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective. We affirm-the conviction subject to the outcome of further proceedings on remand as to ineffectiveness of counsel.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. OrtizWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.