Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 16, 1991No. 23691-1-I; 25737-4-IPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtForrest, J.

Jack Young appeals from his convictions of first degree statutory rape and indecent liberties. A personal restraint petition has been consolidated with this appeal and the issues will be discussed together. Young claims that the court erred by: admitting medical testimony as to the abused condition of the victim's genitals; denying the appellant's motion to suppress evidence; denying a request for a new trial and new counsel; and failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective. We affirm-the conviction subject to the outcome of further proceedings on remand as to ineffectiveness of counsel.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. OrtizWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API