Legal Opinion

State v. Varga

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2004No. 74375-4PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

Pursuant to RAP 4.4, this court transferred the above captioned appeals from Division One of the Court of Appeals to address the question whether in light of this court’s decisions in State v. Cruz, 139 Wn.2d 186, 985 P.2d 384 (1999) and State v. Smith, 144 Wn.2d 665, 30 P.3d 1245, 39 P.3d 294 (2001), the 2002 amendments to RCW 9.94A-.525 and RCW 9.94A.030 of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA) may require sentencing courts to include previously “washed out” convictions when determining defendants’ criminal histories and offender scores for crimes committed after the amendments’ effective…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API