Legal Opinion
In the Interest of A.R.R.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 8, 2001No. 2-01-030-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.
Appellant Earl Alan Rosenfeld appeals the termination of his parental rights to his child, A.R.R. Rosenfeld complains that (1) the trial court improperly applied section 161.001(1)(L) and (Q) to terminate his parental rights in violation of article I, section 16 of the constitution’s prohibition against ex post facto laws; (2) there was no evidence to support the trial court’s *694finding that his parental rights should be terminated; (3) there was no evidence to support the trial court’s finding that the termination was in the best interest of the child; and (4)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Texas Department of Human Services v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of A.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- in the Interest of E.M.N., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
- in the Interest of W.J.H., Jr., J.J.H., D.D.H., and D.N.H., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.