in the Interest of E.M.N., a Child
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.
In two issues, appellant Donna Lynn J. appeals the termination of her parental rights to E.M.N., asserting that termination under section 161.001(1)(T) of the family code violated her right against the imposition of ex post facto laws and that there was insufficient evidence to show that termination was in the best interest of the child. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
E.M.N. was born on August 27, 1999; she was almost seven years old at the time of the termination trial. Appellant testified that E.M.N. was her “miracle child” because Appellant was addicted to cocaine…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by163 opinions
- in the Interest of M.C.T., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
- in the Interest of A.J.M. and E.A.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- in the Interest of K.G., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- in the Interest of D.M.F., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- in the Interest of D.D.G., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.