Legal Opinion

Boesiger v. DeModena

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1965No. 9425PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNUDSON, Justice.

Appellants, Max A. Boesiger and Ruth H. Boesiger, husband and wife (plaintiffs), were the owners of property described as lots 2 to 6 inclusive of Block 1, and lots 11, 12 and 13 of Block 3 of Boesigers Subdivision No. 1, an addition to the city of Mountain Home, Idaho. Respondent Mario DeModena (defendant) owned lots 75 and 76 in Jerome Addition, which lots were located directly across Third East Street from the said property owned by appellants.

Under date of July 6, 1961 said parties entered into a “Real Estate Agreement” of which the following is a copy:

REAL ESTATE…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wooten v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Molyneux v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Childs v. ReedIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Farm Development Corporation v. HernandezIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Suchan v. SuchanIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Rogers v. HendrixIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Bennett v. BlissIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API