Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Arrington Construction Company

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1968No. 10194PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEAR, Justice.

On this appeal, the appellants’ sole contention is that it was improper for the trial court to summarily dismiss appellants’ second cause of action. The question presented is whether the sufficiency of a cause of action alleging rights as a third party beneficiary pursuant to a public works construction contract can properly be tested by a motion to strike. We conclude that a cause of action cannot be tested by a motion to strike.

On the night of January 3, 1966, Ivan Stewart was driving his propane gas delivery truck on Garfield Street in Idaho Falls. The street was undergoing…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Johnson v. Holmes Tuttle Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Myrtle S. Shull and Walter G. Shull v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Anderson v. RexroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. New Home Appliance Center, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Rutter v. McLaughlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Just's, Inc. v. Arrington Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Orthman v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cook v. SoltmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gardner v. HollifieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API