Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Courtney

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 22, 2003No. 3719PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

Wayne Schmidt (Schmidt) and Terri J. Schmidt initiated a negligence action against Michael Courtney for injuries Schmidt sustained when he was struck in the head by a golf ball while roofing a house located adjacent to a golf course. Kemper Sports of Crowfield, Inc. (Kemper Sports) was later joined on claims of negligent design, operation, and maintenance of the golf course. The circuit court judge granted Kemper Sports’ motion for summary judgment. Schmidt appeals. We reverse and remand.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On August 27,1998, 1 Schmidt was roofing a house located at 113…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Fleming v. RoseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ellis v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Rife v. Hitachi Const. MacHinery Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Moore v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Singleton v. ShererCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Mulherin-Howell v. CobbCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API