Legal Opinion

Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & Regulation

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 7, 1999No. 24999PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice:

Mike and Mary Steinke, the parents and personal representatives of the estate of Zachary Steinke, and Linda Nash Given, the mother and personal representative of the estate of Michael Nash (Respondents), brought wrongful death actions against the South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation (Department). The jury awarded the statutory beneficiaries of each teenager $1 million in actual damages. Nash’s award was reduced to $900,000 because the jury concluded he was ten percent at fault.1

The trial judge denied Department’s motions for a directed verdict, a…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Leake v. CainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Ludwick v. This Minute of Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Creech v. South Carolina Wildlife & Marine Resources DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ward v. Dixie National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Pye v. Estate of Fox Ex Rel. Estate of FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API