Greenlee v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff brought her action against the defendant bank and the defendant Marie C. Greenlee to compel a surrender to her of a certain promissory note and a reconveyance to her of land which she had conveyed to the bank by trust deed as security for the payment of her note. Claiming an interest in the note and in the security given for its payment, T. E. Ease intervened. Judgment was given in favor of the bank and of the intervener, and from that judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial plaintiff Clara Russell Greenlee and defendant Marie C. Greenlee have appealed. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crescent Canal Co. v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Buckeye Refining Co. v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Graham Paper Co. v. PembrokeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Donohoe-Kelly Banking Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Walker v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jones v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Mason v. Drug, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- McGown v. DalzellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Pardue v. Citizens Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Ross v. ThirlwallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.