Mason v. Drug, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The trial court sustained the demurrers of two of the defendants without leave to amend. Prom the judgment entered the plaintiff has appealed.
Including fictitious parties, the plaintiff named a large number of defendants, several corporations, and many individuals. No person appeared as being one of the fictitious defendants excepting W. W. Hindman. All of the other individuals are directors of the corporate defendants. Except Owl Drug Preferred Stockholders Association, all of the corporations named are alleged to be the affiliates and agents of Drug, Inc., a corporation. The record is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Mullan v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Wikstrom v. Yolo Fliers ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Green v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Tarmann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Willson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Beyerbach v. Juno Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.