Graham Paper Co. v. Pembroke
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
The plaintiff, and the defendant the Pacific Roll Paper Company, are corporations. On December 23, 1893, the Pacific Roll Paper Company was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of about fifteen thousand dollars due on merchandise accounts, and on that day T. J. Corwin, the president of said Pacific Roll Paper Company, in the name of the corporation, by himself as president, executed to the plaintiff a written assignment of “all its book accounts and bills receivable, including all debts of every kind now due to said Pacific Roll Paper Company, from any person or persons, and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spain v. Hamilton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Laclede Bank v. SchulerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Judson v. CorcoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Bishop v. HolcombSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
- Foster v. MixSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Jones v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- H. S. Mann Corp. v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Adamson v. PaonessaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.