Legal Opinion

McGown v. Dalzell

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1925No. Docket No. 5161PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.

Appeal by Malcolm McGown and George F. Witter from a portion of an order of the superior court of the county of Alameda made after judgment entered in said court in the action of McGown v. William Dalzell et al. The order was based on a motion to recall an execution issued in said action.

The facts as shown by the record are as follows: Appellant George F. Witter, an attorney at law practicing his profession in the county of Alameda, was during the year 1918 employed by appellant McGown to commence and conduct the action above entitled, to recover a sum represented by a promissory note. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Gage v. AtwaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Goldman v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hackett v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Leese v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wagner v. SariottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. In Re Marriage of ShoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Tracy v. RingoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. City of Los Angeles v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Rosenberg v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API