Legal Opinion

Skoglund v. Moore Dry Dock Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1936No. Civ. 9643PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury awarding plaintiff the sum of $4,000 for personal injuries suffered on the premises of defendant.

A number of points are urged in support of the appeal, namely, that the judgment is not sustained by the evidence but is contrary thereto; that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motions for nonsuit, directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and that the court committed error prejudicial to the defendant in permitting plaintiff to repudiate a stipulation of fact.

The position…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Price v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Fresno City High School District v. DillonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Young v. Bates Valve Bag Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Cathcart v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Owen v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API