Legal Opinion

Owen v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1947No. Civ. 15626PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.

The city of Los Angeles appeals from a judgment after verdict awarding plaintiff damages for injuries sustained when she stepped off the curb into a hole in the pavement. A reversal of the judgment is sought upon several grounds. It is claimed by the city that the condition of the street where plaintiff fell was neither defective nor dangerous; that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, and that the court erred in the matter of instructions.

In the first point, the city says: “The evidence in this case fails to show any condition other than that usually to be found in the ordinary…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Nicholson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Hall v. Barber Door Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Pittam v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Barrett v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Behr v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Nishihama v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API