Legal Opinion

Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Lord

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 12, 1977No. 46999PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This action challenges the constitutionality of the state designer selection board act, Minn.St. 16.821 to 16.827, as applied to the University of Minnesota. The matter was heard in district court on cross motions for summary judgment and a stipulated set of facts. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the University of Minnesota on the grounds that, as applied to the university, the state designer selection board act invaded the management powers of the Board of Regents and thus violated Minn.Const. art. 13, § 3. We reverse.

On appeal this court is presented with…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Regents of the University v. Employment Relations CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Board of Regents of University of Michigan v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Sterling v. Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. SundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Guzmán Vargas v. CalderónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2006
  3. Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Winberg v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Durham v. ParksDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API