Legal Opinion

Board of Regents of University of Michigan v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1911No. Calendar No. 21,703PublishedCited by 57 opinions

Mandamus proceedings by the board of regents of the University of Michigan against James B. Bradley, auditor general of the State of Michigan, to compel the issuance of a warrant upon the treasurer for certain expenditures and disbursements.

1Opinion of the CourtSteers, J.

In this proceeding the court is asked to decide whether the judgment of the auditor general or that of the board of regents shall prevail respecting the expenditure of moneys appropriated for the use and maintenance of the University by Act No. 102, Pub. Acts 1899. On April 30, 1906, the treasurer of the University made requisition upon the respondent for monthly expenditures from the appropriation of the so-ealled quarter-mill tax, amounting to $39,452.50, for the payment of current expenses. In making this requisition he followed the usual practice, which was in harmony with the methods…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Sterling v. Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People ex rel. Drake v. Regents of the UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Bauer v. State Board of AgricultureMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Regents of the University of Michigan v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Federated Publications, Inc v. Michigan State University Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Civil Service Commission v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API