Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Chillious
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 8, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 30, 2003 and May 9, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant lost her employment as a food packer at a catering company due to disqualifying misconduct. Claimant concedes that she failed to follow the normal sign-out procedures at the end of her shift. Claimant was called back to her station by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of GoodrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re GhoulianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of RowenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of GlinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Matter of Bakir (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015