Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Kryszak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 18, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 30, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

*646Claimant worked as a press assistant at the employer printing company. He was discharged after reporting for work unable to perform his job responsibilities due to intoxication. Claimant had a history of poor attendance and had been the subject of repeated warnings, initially oral and then in a written “Last Chance Agreement,” providing that he would be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of SadowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of UntermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re the Claim of InschoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AlmanzarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of StuberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re the Claim of Garcia-PrimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re the Claim of HolderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API