Legal Opinion
Isaksen v. Chesapeake Instrument Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1963PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Secs. 180.62 to 180.69, Stats., authorize corporate mergers and consolidations. Sec. 180.69 grants to one who holds shares in a corporation which is a party to a merger or consolidation and who dissents therefrom the right to recover the fair value of his shares from the surviving corporation upon surrender of his. stock certificates. If he takes certain steps to record his dissent, and acts timely, he is entitled to the remedy provided in sec. 180.69 (3), and sub. (4) provides that the remedy is exclusive. He may—
“. . . file a petition in the circuit court of the county in which the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Worachek v. Stephenson Town School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Rice v. Ashland CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- State ex rel. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- State ex. rel. Jackson v. LeichtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Henry S. Cooper, Inc. v. Town of Pleasant PrairieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Neelen v. LucasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Kayden Industries, Inc. v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Teamsters Union Local 695 v. County of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Estate of EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Schulter v. RoraffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.