Kayden Industries, Inc. v. Murphy
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The principal issues are:(1) Is the 1965 amendment to sec. 24, art. IV of the Wisconsin constitution self-executing?
*724(2) Did the subsequent legislative acts effectively reestablish the prohibition against the type of game sold by the plaintiff T
The problem confronting the court is the construction of a constitutional amendment and the related statutory enactments.
The original constitutional provision (sec. 24, art. IV) which stood unamended until 1965, provided as follows:
“Lotteries and divorces. Section 24. The legislature shall never authorize any lottery, or grant any divorce.”
In April of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Neelen v. LucasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Cowie v. La Crosse Theaters Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- State ex rel. Ekern v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Regez v. BlumerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Hull v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. CousanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Kneip v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Panzer v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.