Legal Opinion

Kayden Industries, Inc. v. Murphy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1967PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The principal issues are:(1) Is the 1965 amendment to sec. 24, art. IV of the Wisconsin constitution self-executing?

*724(2) Did the subsequent legislative acts effectively reestablish the prohibition against the type of game sold by the plaintiff T

The problem confronting the court is the construction of a constitutional amendment and the related statutory enactments.

The original constitutional provision (sec. 24, art. IV) which stood unamended until 1965, provided as follows:

“Lotteries and divorces. Section 24. The legislature shall never authorize any lottery, or grant any divorce.”

In April of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Neelen v. LucasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State Ex Rel. Cowie v. La Crosse Theaters Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State ex rel. Ekern v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State Ex Rel. Regez v. BlumerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Hull v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. CousanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  3. Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kneip v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Panzer v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API