Harlow v. Clow
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The writ of habeas corpus does not take the place of an appeal. It is a civil proceeding providing a remedy for one who is wrongfully deprived of his liberty.
Upon a conviction for vagrancy, the Municipal Court of the City of Klamath Falls is empowered to impose a sentence of not more than 50 days, or a fine of not to exceed $100, or both such fine and imprisonment. The Municipal Court did pronounce judgment upon the petitioner, imposing upon him a penalty of 25 days in jail and a fine of $100. Before the petitioner had served his jail sentence of 25 days, lawfully passed, he instituted this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Wong v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- State v. AyersOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. BergmanOregon Supreme Court · 1877
- Ex parte FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Landreth v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- ANDERSON Ex Rel POE v. GLADDENOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. FrancisOregon Supreme Court · 1928
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.