Legal Opinion

Byers v. Cathcart

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1997No. B100260PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZEBROWSKI, J.

This appeal concerns an injunction issued pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6 (section 527.6.) Section 527.6 is a specialized statute providing an expedited procedure for issuance of limited-scope and limited-duration injunctions in instances of “harassment.” The term “harassment" is narrowly defined in section 527.6. Among other aspects of the definition, the complained-of conduct must have “no legitimate purpose” in order to constitute “harassment." (§ 527.6, subd. (b).)

The complained-of conduct which generated this appeal was parking a car along the side…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morcos v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Schild v. RubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Milman v. ShukhatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Diamond View Limited v. HerzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Smith v. SilveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thomas v. QuinteroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Krug v. MaschmeierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Banda v. Wash CA5California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Bornemann v. Gamboa CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Chandler v. Dayton CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API