Legal Opinion

Krug v. Maschmeier

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 2009No. A121940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, P. J.—

I. INTRODUCTION

In 1978, the California Legislature enacted a statute permitting persons who are victims of specified types of harassment to seek injunctive relief against the harassing party. The statute has always provided that the trial court may award attorney fees to the prevailing party in an action brought under the statute. In the more than 30 years since the statute’s enactment, however, no published opinion has squarely decided the question whether a prevailing defendant in an action under the statute can recover attorney fees when the action, though…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. KnollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Cornette v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Craven v. CroutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Neville v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Marriage of Watrous CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. Forest, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. People v. ForestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API