Legal Opinion
Chandler v. Dayton CA1/2
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 24, 2020No. A160485Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 11/24/20 Chandler v. Dayton CA1/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO RHODA CHANDLER, Plaintiff and Respondent, A160485 v. EDWARD DAYTON, (Solano County Super. Ct. No. FCS053619) Defendant and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Opdyk v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- United Grand Corp. v. Malibu Hillbillies, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Fletcher v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. JTH Tax, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Harris v. StampolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.