Morcos v. Board of Retirement
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROUSSARD, J.
We granted review in this case to decide whether under Government Code section 315361 a successful retirement applicant may recover attorney fees incurred in defending the judgment of the superior court on appeal. Section 31536 authorizes the superior court to award fees *926to a successful applicant, but does not expressly state whether it applies to attorney fees incurred in successfully defending a favorable judgment before the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court. A divided Court of Appeal held it does not.
We conclude that the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- San Gabriel Tribune v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- T.E.D. Bearing Co. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Fed-Mart Corp. v. Pell Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Leaf v. Phil Rauch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Church of Scientology v. WollersheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Sir Speedy, Inc. v. L & P Graphics, Inc., Neil H. Blatte and Business Service Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Evans v. UnkowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Zagami, Inc. v. James A. Crone, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Jankey v. Song Koo LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.