Legal Opinion

Schild v. Rubin

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1991No. B052727PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, J.

—Two neighbors, who happen to be lawyers, have bounced their unfortunate dispute from a basketball court into the courts of law. Respondent Michael Rubin successfully applied to the trial court for a permanent injunction to prohibit his neighbors, appellant Kenneth Schild and his wife (appellant Gail Schild), and any other person from playing basketball on the Schilds’ property except during specified hours of the day. The trial court issued the injunction pursuant to the statute authorizing injunctive relief from willful harassment. (Code Civ. Proc., § 527.6.) Because we find…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Landucci v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Thomas v. QuinteroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Bookout v. NielsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Duronslet v. KampsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Harris v. StampolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API