Legal Opinion

In Re Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 10, 1962No. 453PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

Mrs. Wilson, by habeas corpus, challenges the legality of her restraint upon the ground the clerk’s order committing her to the State Hospital at Butner violated her rights under Article I, Section 17, Constitution of North Carolina, and under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The original order of commitment for 60 days observation and treatment and the follow-up order for additional observation and treatment for four months have terminated. However, the permanent order entered on October 14, 1959, is the basis of her present restraint.

*596The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Simon v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Eason v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. In Re the Custody of GuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Matter of ReedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Frizzelle v. Harnett CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Anderson v. SolomonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1970
  5. Plomaritis v. PlomaritisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API