Legal Opinion

Plomaritis v. Plomaritis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 2012No. COA11-1554PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

“It is a truism that justice delayed is frequently justice denied.” Rice v. Rigsby, 259 N.C. 506, 519, 131 S.E.2d 469, 478 (1963). The complaint in this matter was filed in 2003, the equitable distribution trial was held in 2006, and, by this opinion, we unfortunately must reverse the equitable distribution order and remand for a new trial. It is particularly troubling that this case has been so protracted as equitable distribution is one of the few types of claims which has time goals for completion of various steps of the case set forth by statute. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-21…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Willoughby v. KENNETH W. WILKINS, MD, PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. H. C. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Eason v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Denny v. DennyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. Maddukuri v. ChintanippuCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  3. Maddukuri v. ChintanippuCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API