Frizzelle v. Harnett County
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Plaintiffs, contesting the validity of the Harnett County zoning ordinance as to the southern section of the county, first argue that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment because the notices of the hearing prior to the enactment of the zoning ordinance on 18 July 1988 were neither reasonable nor adequate to apprise plaintiffs and other landowners within the southern section of Harnett County of the pending process of adopting a zoning ordinance; therefore, the notices were in contravention of G.S. § 153A-323 (1987) and due process of law.
Summ…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- In Re the Custody of GuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- George v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blalock v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Templeton v. Town of BooneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Thrash Ltd. P'ship v. County of BuncombeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Laurel Valley Watch, Inc. v. MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES OF WOLF RIDGE, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Thrash Ltd. Partnership v. County of BuncombeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.