Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Holohan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 21, 1935PublishedCited by 1,791 opinions

1Per curiam

Thomas J. Mooney asks leave to file petition for an original writ of habeas corpus. He states that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the State of California under a commitment pursuant to a conviction, in February, 1917, of murder in the first degree and sentence of death subsequently commuted to life imprisonment. He submits the record of proceedings set forth in his petition for a writ of habeas corpus presented to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California and dismissed upon the ground that the petitioner had not exhausted his legal remedies…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Moore v. DempseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Robb v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,791 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

1,786 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API