Legal Opinion

In Re the Custody of Gupton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1953No. 106PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

The law of the land clause embodied in Article I, Section 17, of the North Carolina Constitution guarantees to the litigant in every kind of judicial proceeding the right to an adequate and fair hearing before he can be deprived of his claim or defense by judicial decree. Eason v. Spence, 232 N.C. 579, 61 S.E. 2d 717; Surety Corp. v. Sharpe, 232 N.C. 98, 59 S.E. 2d 593.

Where the claim or defense turns upon a factual adjudication, the constitutional right of the litigant to an adequate and fair hearing requires that he be apprised of all the evidence received by the court and given an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Eason v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. National Surety Corporation v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State v. DarrochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re: Joseph Lee MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. CrockerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Kesseler v. KesselerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Matter of Alamance County Ct. FacilitiesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API