Legal Opinion

Tate v. Stone

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 28, 1913No. 2401PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Grady County Court; N. M. Williams, Judge. Action by L. D. Stone against A. P. Tate. Judgment for plaintiff,. and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

On March 23, 1909, the defendant in error, as plaintiff, commenced a forcible detainer action against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, in a justice of the peace court for the possession of a certain tract of land. On March 16, 1909, plaintiff served notice upon the defendant to quit.

In his petition he declares that he was “entitled to immediate possession of said land * * * by virtue of a contract with Geo. A. Harrison, of Ada, Oklahoma, guardian of Chilly Nelson, a citizen of the Choctaw Nation, and the allottee of the land above described, which said contract has been duly approved by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCabe & Steen Construction Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. Baker v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. CakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Herron v. M. Rumley Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Owen v. United States Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Davis v. RowlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Hughes v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Ince Nursery Co. v. SamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API