Legal Opinion

Baker v. Newton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 22, 1910No. 600PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from Ottawa, County Court; D. W. Talbot, Judge. Action between K. E. Newton and Charles Baker. From the judgment the latter brings error. No copies ^of briefs reached the reporter.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

This proceeding in error is brought to have reviewed a judgment of the county court of Ottawa county. The proceedings in that court were presented to this court upon the application of plaintiff in error for a writ of certiorari in Baker v. Newton et al., 22 Okla. 658. The proceedings of the trial court contain a great many irregularities, most of which are set out in the statement of facts in the foregoing ease. The procedure attempted to be followed was that applicable to courts of justices of the peace. Plaintiff in error now contends, as he did in the former case, that no trial was ever…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. American Publishing Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Plimpton v. Town of SomersetSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
  4. State ex rel. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co. v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. Baker v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Keeter v. State Ex Rel. Saye, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. State Bar Commission Ex Rel. Williams v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Bilby v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API