St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. v. Phillips
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the Prolate Court of Oklahoma County; lefore Wm. P. Harper, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OP PACTS. On June 28, 1904, D. M. Phillips commenced this action in the probate court of Oklahoma county against the St. Louis & San Francisco Eailroad Company, by filing his petition therein, claiming damages in the sum of $300, for the killing of one horse and the injuring of three others, while being transported by the railroad company from Oklahoma City, O. T., to Hoxie,…
Read the full summary
Error from the Prolate Court of Oklahoma County; lefore Wm. P. Harper, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OP PACTS. On June 28, 1904, D. M. Phillips commenced this action in the probate court of Oklahoma county against the St. Louis & San Francisco Eailroad Company, by filing his petition therein, claiming damages in the sum of $300, for the killing of one horse and the injuring of three others, while being transported by the railroad company from Oklahoma City, O. T., to Hoxie, Arkansas. On April 21, 1905, Phillips filed an amended petition, setting out in addition to the foregoing allegations, a copy…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Irwin, J.:
The plaintiff in error seeks a reversal of this judgment on six different grounds: First, that plaintiff in error was entitled to judgment on the pleadings in said cause, and the court erred in overruling his motion therefor; Second, the court erred in not sustaining the objection of the plaintiff in error to the introduction of any evidence by the defendant in error on the ground that the pleadings did not state a cause of action in favor of the plaintiff; Third, the court erred in overruling the demurrer of the plaintiff in error to the evidence; Fourth, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- McDill v. GunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- United States Express Co. v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WidmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Goggin v. Kansas Pac. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Clegg v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Meshek v. CordesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ZickafooseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LaddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.