Legal Opinion
Arcelormittal France v. Ak Steel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 30, 2012No. 2011-1638PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Opinion dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge WALLACH.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
ArcelorMittal France and ArcelorMittal Atlantique et Lorraine (collectively “ArcelorMittal”) appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The judgment is based on a jury verdict finding that defendants AK Steel Corporation, Severstal Dearborn, Inc., and Wheeling-Nisshin Inc. (“AK Steel”) did not infringe ArcelorMittal’s U.S. Patent No. 6,296,805 (“the '805 patent”) and that the asserted claims were invalid as…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Arcelormittal France v. Ak Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Arcelormittal v. Ak Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- ArcelorMittal Atlantique Et Lorraine v. AK Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- B-K Lighting, Inc. v. Vision3 LightingDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Medisim Ltd. v. Bestmed, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.