Legal Opinion
Arcelormittal v. Ak Steel Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 16, 2017No. 2016-1357PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALLACH.
HUGHES, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs sued Defendants in 2010 for infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,296,805. After our most recent remand in this case, the district court invalidated claims 24 and 25 of U.S. Patent No. RE44,153, the reissue of the ’805 patent. We conclude that the district court possessed subject matter jurisdiction when it granted summary judgment, that the court properly followed our most recent mandate, and that the court properly exercised its discretion to deny ArcelorMittal’s Rule 56(d) request. Accordingly, we affirm.
I
A
The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- ArcelorMittal Atlantique Et Lorraine v. AK Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Tq Delta, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Synopsys, Inc. v. Risk Based Security, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- Molon Motor and Coil Corp. v. Nidec Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- AT&T Corp. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.