Legal Opinion

B-K Lighting, Inc. v. Vision3 Lighting

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 11, 2013No. Case No. CV 06-02825 MMM (PLAx)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: B-K LIGHTING’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF VALIDITY AND FRESNO VALVES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY; FRESNO VALVES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INFRINGEMENT

MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.

This is a patent dispute between B-K Lighting, Inc. (“B-K”) and Fresno Valves & Castings, Inc. (“FVC”). On May 23, 2008, the court granted FVC’s motion for summary judgment of invalidity, finding the patent-in-suit invalid on grounds of obviousness.1 B-K appealed.2 The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed *1108in part and vacated in part, and remanded the case for…

2Cases cited114 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martini E Ricci Lamino S.P.A.-Consortile Societa Agricola v. Trinity Fruit Sales Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  2. Alexander v. ChadwickDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
  3. Avanos Medical Sales, LLC v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
  4. Corson v. JAMHI Health and Wellness, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 2022
  5. HACKER v. 3M COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API