Legal Opinion

ArcelorMittal Atlantique Et Lorraine v. AK Steel Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 5, 2018No. 2017-1637PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reyna, Circuit Judge.

Appellants appeal from a grant of summary judgment of non-infringement. The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware granted summary judgment as a matter of law after concluding Appellants' infringement action was collaterally estopped. Because evidence indicates a material difference in the accused products in this action, collateral estoppel does not apply and the entry of summary judgment was error. We vacate and remand.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff-Appellants ArcelorMittal Atlantique et Lorraine and ArcelorMittal and Plaintiff-Appellants' predecessor in interest,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. Renchenski v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
  2. Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022
  3. Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022
  4. Applied Materials, Inc. v. Demaray LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  5. Global Health Solutions LLC v. SelnerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API