ArcelorMittal Atlantique Et Lorraine v. AK Steel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Reyna, Circuit Judge.
Appellants appeal from a grant of summary judgment of non-infringement. The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware granted summary judgment as a matter of law after concluding Appellants' infringement action was collaterally estopped. Because evidence indicates a material difference in the accused products in this action, collateral estoppel does not apply and the entry of summary judgment was error. We vacate and remand.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff-Appellants ArcelorMittal Atlantique et Lorraine and ArcelorMittal and Plaintiff-Appellants' predecessor in interest,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Renchenski v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- Applied Materials, Inc. v. Demaray LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Global Health Solutions LLC v. SelnerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.