Citadel Holding Corp. v. Roven
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Justice.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Superior Court awarding damages in an action brought by a former director against Citadel Holding corporation (“Citadel”) under an indemnification agreement. The court ruled that the director, Alfred Roven (“Roven”), was entitled to reimbursement for sums paid or costs incurred by him to defray litigation expenses in a federal court action brought against him by Citadel. Ro-ven cross-appeals from the Superior Court’s denial of prejudgment interest. We affirm the Superior Court’s ruling on the merits of the contractual dispute but reverse…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gilbert v. El Paso Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Broadway Maintenance Corp. v. RutgersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Moskowitz v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- Klair v. ReeseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- International Business Machines Corp. v. Sperry Rand Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by232 opinions
- Eagle Industries, Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Allied Capital Corp. v. GC-Sun Holdings, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
- Beard Research, Inc. v. KatesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
- Homestore, Inc. v. TafeenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.