Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurRie, C. J.
The instant appeal and cross appeal present these questions:(1) Whether this court should recognize causes of action grounded on promissory estoppel as exemplified by sec. 90 of Restatement, Contracts ?(2) Do the facts in this case make out a. cause of action for promissory estoppel ?(3) Are the jury’s findings with respect to damages sustained by the evidence ?
Recognition of a Cause of Action Grounded on Promissory Estoppel.
Sec. 90 of Restatement, 1 Contracts, provides (at p. 110) :
“A promise which the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance of a definite and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Schafer v. Fraser Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Chrysler Corp. v. QuimbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
- Feinberg v. Pfeiffer CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Northwestern Engineering Co. v. EllermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- Barry C. Cosgrove, Cross-Appellee v. Joseph Bartolotta and Mary-Bart, Llc, Doing Business as Bartolotta's Lake Park BistroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Skycom Corporation and Gerald M. Walters v. Telstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- All-Tech Telecom, Inc. v. Amway CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Producciones Tommy Muñiz, Inc. v. Comité Organizador de los VIII Juegos Panamericanos (COPAN)Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1982
- Banas v. Matthews International Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.